Concise Description:
Since the IGF's inception, the Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG) has
been crucial in collating feedback on what works and what doesn't work so
well at the IGF and turning the community's suggestions for improvements
into a continuous program of IGF self-improvement.
In 2010, a new process for IGF improvements was introduced via the creation
of the CSTD WG on improvements to the IGF (chartered by ECOSOC resolution
2010/2).
This fully interactive roundtable workshop will include the full range of
stakeholders, including representatives from the IGF MAG and CSTD WG, to
discuss a broad range of ideas and provide an opportunity to exchange
perspectives on proposed improvements tabled within the CSTD WG as well as
the various discussions and consultations that have occurred in the past
months.
Although the WG officially consists only of CSTD member states, in practice,
it has embraced multistakeholder participation, and treated the
non-government representatives to the WG as equal participants to the
process.
This workshop will:
- Look at the responses to the CSTD Working Group Questionnaire and the
range of ideas from across stakeholder groups
- Examine some example improvements the IGF self-improvement process has
introduced, and other potential improvements the CSTD WG could identify in
the future.
- Discuss the best processes that can be used in the future to identify and
implement improvements to the IGF.
Remote participation will be an integral part of this workshop including
real-time transcription, and remote participation support.
From twitter...
|
fortuny (Jaume Fortuny) |
RT @mongkolroek: RT @nnimpuno: de la Chapelle: The WSIS website is beautiful & empty. #IGF website is full of info but ugly. #IGF11 #258 @allisonhornery |
1 year 33 weeks ago |
|
mongkolroek (Michael Riggs) |
RT @nnimpuno: de la Chapelle: The WSIS website is beautiful & empty. #IGF website is full of info but ugly. #IGF11 #258 @allisonhornery |
1 year 33 weeks ago |
|
sgdickinson (Samantha Dickinson) |
Jeanette Hofmann: Perhaps the boundaries of what can be achieved at IGF depends on whether it's a local, regional & global IGF #IGF11 #258 |
1 year 33 weeks ago |
|
sgdickinson (Samantha Dickinson) |
Jeanette Hoffman summarising: we have high expectations & standards for diversity at IGF compared to other intl (intergov) orgs #IGF11 #258 |
1 year 33 weeks ago |
|
sgdickinson (Samantha Dickinson) |
1 year 33 weeks ago | |
|
nnimpuno (Nurani Nimpuno) |
RT @sgdickinson: Echeberria: Before 2006, IXPs limited 2 tech community issue. IGF 2006 brought IXPs 2 international attention. Great IGF outcome #IGF11 #258 |
1 year 33 weeks ago |
|
timdavies (Tim Davies) |
#igf11 Speaker in #258 thinks we're missing involvement of young people - but coming from #76 I see great youth involvement. A disconnect? |
1 year 33 weeks ago |
|
nnimpuno (Nurani Nimpuno) |
RT @sgdickinson: de la Chapelle: we don't have to have consensus outcomes in IGF outputs. Outputs could note when there's no agreement too. #IGF11 #258 |
1 year 33 weeks ago |
|
nnimpuno (Nurani Nimpuno) |
1 year 33 weeks ago | |
|
nnimpuno (Nurani Nimpuno) |
1 year 33 weeks ago |
- 1 of 9
- ››
#igf11 #258